You are currently browsing the daily archive for May 17, 2020.

17.05.2020 – Global Voices Online

Monumental differences: Prague, Moscow trade barbs over World War Two
May 13, 2020 view of the former Marshal Konev monument with it statue removed. The sprayed text on the wooden structure reads “Koněv = vrah” which translates as “Konev = assassin” (Image by by Filip Noubel, used with permission)

As one ‘liberator’ vanishes from sight, another is on the rise

The buildup to the 75th anniversary of the end of World War Two, marked earlier this month, has exacerbated a longstanding row about how contested historical figures should be perceived in both the Czech Republic and Russia.

In Prague, one of those figures — a controversial Soviet Marshal — was abruptly removed from a prominent square last month, amid furious objections from Moscow. Another figure, meanwhile, saw his own geopolitically contentious monument unveiled on May 9, the anniversary of the war’s end.

Key to the standoff between the two countries is the argument over the liberation of the Czechoslovakia in 1945, which helped usher in almost half a century of communism in Central and Eastern Europe.

Former brothers turned enemies?

The Czech Republic and Russia enjoy a rich yet often conflictual relationship in which 20th century history looms large.

From 1948 to 1989, then-Czechoslovakia was officially communist and joined the Warsaw Pact military alliance in 1955. The first major crack in the Moscow-Prague axis occurred in August 1968 when the Soviet Union sent troops to Czechoslovakia to crush a political spring that rejected communist orthodoxies.

After this bloody episode, official relations normalised. In fact, by the time reformist Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in Moscow in the 1980s, it was Czechoslovak leaders who resisted the need for political change.

But change could only be resisted so long.

After perestroika eventually reached Prague, previously unimaginable developments followed. First Soviet troops left Czechoslovakia. The iron curtain collapsed, reopening Europe.

In 1993, Czechoslovakia itself split into two entities — the Czech Republic and Slovakia — both of which joined the European Union (EU) in 2004. From 1989 to 2003, the Czech Republic was led by former dissident and outspoken critic of communism Václav Havel.

From Moscow’s perspective, this all meant a huge loss of influence and prestige.

In 1999, Prague completely turned its back on its former ally, by joining NATO.

During this period, the Czech national history heavily censored by the Communist Party line for over four decades was being vigorously reevaluated.

Who liberated Prague in 1945?

The view held by Moscow — and Prague until 1989 — is that the Soviet Red Army, led by Marshal Ivan Konev, played the main role in Prague’s liberation, chasing away the remnants of the German Wehrmacht.

Today this idea is endorsed by the revisionist Communist Party of Moravia and Bohemia and Moravia (KSČM), a Czech party that counts over 33,000 members and is typically supportive of incumbent President Miloš Zeman

This history is still celebrated in monuments across the country that were erected during the communist period.

But since 1989, other interpretations of the event have portrayed the Soviet Red Army as having played at best a minor role in the liberation.

These accounts stress instead the role played by a group of Russians who were recruited by Nazi Germany to fight the Soviet Union — the “Vlasovtsy”, named after their leader Andrey Vlasov — but who later rebelled against the Germans.

The debate remains remarkably passionate and is easily harnessed in modern-day geopolitics.

For Moscow, it is part of the “ungrateful Europe” narrative according to which Central and Western Europe underplay the Red Army’s liberation of Europe.

This sentiment was recently reinforced in Russia, after a European Parliament resolution adopted on September 19, 2019, blamed the Nazi-Soviet pact signed by Berlin and for World War Two.

The fight over urban historical memory

In the Czech Republic, tensions surrounding the liberation of Prague and the general perception of Russia have been stirred by recent political developments.

The statue of Marshal Konev, standing in Prague 6, a district of the Czech capital, was regularly defaced with paint. Citing effort and expenses spent cleaning it up, district mayor Ondřej Kolář proposed to remove it. Konev has iconic status in Soviet and Russian history.

On April 3, in the middle of the state of emergency declared by the Czech authorities to fight COVID-19, the statue was promptly removed.

The Russian embassy expressed outrage via its Facebook page:

Clearly, the initiators of the wars on monuments, through their acts of provocation, are causing a worsening of Russian-Czech relations. The removal of Marshal Konev’s monument will not be left unanswered and Russia will react.

Meanwhile, the Mayor of Řeporyje, a small town of 4,000 inhabitants that is part of Prague’s 13th district, Pavel Novotný, announced he would erect a monument celebrating the positive role played by the Vlasov Army in his town.

The monument was inaugurated May 9, and includes a quote from Soviet dissident writer Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:

Did in fact all Czechs then realize what kind of Russians saved their city?

Photos of the monument were shared on Twitter:

Ondřej Hladík@HladikOndra

Pomník ruským protistalinským vlastencům, “vlasovcům”, kteří v květnu 1945 účinně přispěli k obraně Prahy proti jednotkám SS.

Zabránili tím mnoha dalším obětem v řadách českých povstalců a zařadili se po jejich boku k hrdinům Pražského povstání.

Čest i jejich památce!

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter
See Ondřej Hladík’s other Tweets

The monument to the anti-Stalinist patriots, the Vlasovtsy, who successfully participated in May 1945 in the defense of Prague against SS troops. They prevented many victims among the Czech resistance, and joined the ranks of the heroes of the Prague Uprising. We salute their memory.

The battle over monuments follows another symbolism-packed dispute over the name of a square in Prague where the Russian Embassy is located.

Prague’s mayor Zdeněk Hřib, who represents the opposition Pirate Party, and often speaks out in favor of human rights in Russia and China, supported the February 24 decision of the city to rename the square called Pod kaštany (literally ‘Under the chestnuts’) after Boris Nemtsov, the Russian rights activist and opposition politician assassinated in Moscow in February 2015.

During the February 27 opening, Hřib posted a photo of the new square sign on his Twitter account:

Zdeněk Hřib@ZdenekHrib

Dnes u příležitosti smutného pátého výročí vraždy Borise Němcova jsme po něm přejmenovali původní náměstí Pod Kaštany. A to za účasti jeho dcery Žanny Němcovové.

View image on Twitter
177 people are talking about this

Today on the sad occasion of the fifth anniversary of the assassination of Boris Nemtsov we [renamed this square] after him, in the presence of his daughter Zhanna Nemtsova.

Moscow’s response

Moscow seems prepared to respond to these perceived slights with slights of its own.

On April 17, it informed the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs that it had changed the official postal address of its Prague Embassy to another street, called Korunovační, as the large compound occupies a space in which the Boris Nemtsov Square is only one side of its location.

On April 16, a group of officials from the Russian Ministry of Defense sent a proposal to Defence Minister Sergey Shoygu to rename Moscow’s “Prague” subway station to the Marshal Ivan Konev station as a reaction to Konev’s statue getting dismantled in Prague.

The proposal is a recommendation and has as yet not triggered an official response from the Russian government.

As tensions escalate between Moscow and Prague, the Czech police confirmed in May that all three Czech mayors — Hřib, Kolář and Novotný — have been granted special police protection.

Written byFilip Noubel

16.05.2020 – The Ecologist

Indigenous Shuar People at risk of coronavirus
Hannibal Rhoades

More than 100 organisations have signed a letter repudiating mining companies for putting Indigenous Shuar communities in the Ecuadorean Amazon at risk.

More than 100 organisations from around the world have signed onto an open-letter to show their support for the Shuar Arutam People (PSHA) in the Ecuadorian Amazon as they confront a possible Covid-19 outbreak in their territories.

The initiative responds to the PSHA’s urgent demands of the Ecuadorian government following the death of two people whose close relatives traveled to the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada’s (PDAC) mining fair in Toronto, Canada in March, 2020.

In March, the PSHA denounced the company for bringing 7 Shuar community members to Toronto in supposed representation of the communities, despite not being duly elected representatives of the Shuar Arutam People’s Assembly.

Mining

The PSHA decried the delegation as part of efforts to undermine their categorical rejection of mining in their territory. Upon the delegation’s return to Ecuador, two of their immediate family members died with Covid-19-like symptoms. At least  eight other members of Shuar communities are also showing symptoms.

International organisations condemned Solaris Resources’ “ongoing interference in Shuar indigenous territory as well as its disdain for the self-determining decisions of the PSHA”, noting that“the actions of this company and its subsidiary in Ecuador (Lowell Minerals) constitute serious threats to peace and health in the Amazon region as a whole.”

Other mining companies from Canada, Australia and China also pose a threat to the communities’ ongoing struggle to protect health and the environment against resource extraction.

The open letter observes: “Their activities are causing irreparable damage and putting the social fabric of Indigenous communities and mega-diverse Amazonian ecosystems at grave risk. The mere presence of company employees in the region, due to the possibility of coronavirus transmission, may exacerbate these impacts.”

Solidarity

The letter closes with an expression of solidarity to the PSHA and all Indigenous peoples in the Amazon whose territories are threatened by Covid-19 and resource extraction.

The President of the Shuar Arutam People’s assembly (PSHA), Josefina Tunki, remarks: “In the name of the Shuar Arutam peoples, we are grateful for the solidarity and support that organisations from around the globe have shown us.

“For the Shuar Peoples and other nationalities, this solidarity represents a greater defence for protection which helps us to better defend lives, and protect the water and the forest which are fundamental for the Indigenous and non-Indigenous world”.

Given the difficulties that the Shuar Arutam peoples are now facing, this morning the PSHA launched a crowdsourcing campaign to assist them to collect funds which will be dedicated to buying community sanitation packs and food stuffs for their communities. You can donate here.

Click here to see the full letter and organizations who signed on.

This Article 

Hannibal Rhoades is head of communications at The Gaia Foundation. This article is based on a joint press release from Accion Ecologica, AmazonWatch, Caminantes Ecuador, Fundacion ALDEA, IPS, Global Economy Project, London Mining Network, MiningWatch Canada, Pueblo Shuar Arutam, Yes to Life, No to Mining.

 

 The original article can be found on our partner’s website here

Blog Stats

  • 13,440 hits
May 2020
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Support 2007, 2008 and 2009

More Light Presbyterians

Visite recenti

Dietrich Bonhoeffer

We must act and dare the appropiateness and not whatever comes to our mind not floating in the likelihood but grasp the reality as brave as we can be freedom lies in action not in the absence of mind obedience knows the essence of good and satisfies it, freedom dares to act and returns God the ultimate judgment of what is right and what is wrong, Obedience performs blindly but Freedom is wide awake Freedom wants to know why, Obedience has its hands tied, Freedom is inventive obedient man respects God’s commands and by virtu of his Freedom, he creats new commands. Both Obedience and Freedom come true in responsability (Dietrich Bonhoeffer)

Blog Stats

  • 13,440 hits
Follow Ecumenics and Quakers on WordPress.com