You are currently browsing the daily archive for February 4, 2019.

Libri: quakers (ordinati per popolarità)

MY ERRING WAYS 
I know that you bless me God
And forgive my erring ways
I ask now for the strength
To serve you all my living days
David Herr

Thais Carr2

Reading for February 3 from Praying for Justice. “The name of the Lord is a strong tower; the righteous run into it and are safe.” Proverbs 19: 10

03.02.2019 – Santiago, Chile – Redacción Chile

This post is also available in: SpanishItalian

Nationalism or multilateralism, war or peace
(Image by Ódena Park)

By Juan Gómez, World Centre for Humanist Studies.

Let’s think about the necessary conditions for Peace and Nonviolence to prosper and, while we’re at it, the necessary characteristics that lead to conflict and confrontation.

In terms of “nature”, all human beings have in their inner make up a birth ego that protects them from adversities and helps them survive in a world that is often hostile and highly competitive. Above all men who also have a dose of aggressiveness that helps them defend themselves from possible aggressions and stimulates them to defend their violated rights.  So in the right measure, this is something good for facing life in optimal conditions.

However, if we feed our inner ego, or rather, if we use it and take advantage of it in the environment in which we live, appropriating existing goods at all costs to the detriment of our fellow human beings, then we fall into the overvaluation of the ego, a defect known as “egoism”, something that prevents us from sharing our resources with others.

If we stimulate our egoism through education, we transform it into an unhealthy ambition, and in its most extreme cases, into greed and avarice.  If in the same way we stimulate our aggressiveness, we turn it into intolerant behaviour, into fanaticism, and in its most extreme cases into criminal behaviour.

Ambitious and greedy people are reluctant to share or distribute resources, they have severe apprehension in the face of personal economic loss, so they tend to accumulate more and more possessions.

Very aggressive people become nonchalant in the face of the suffering of others because they find it difficult to empathize.  So, they are inconsiderate and capable of defending their possessions by violent means if necessary.  Their ambition leads them to corruption in terms of acquiring more money and more possessions that also improves their image and social status.

However, if we extrapolate this individual behaviour to the social plane – since a society is the sum of its individuals – and if through education people become ambitious and aggressive, then society as a whole will also be so.  Society will adopt xenophobic, nationalistic and aggressive attitudes towards its neighbours and foreigners in general.  These are societies that highly value “having” over “being”, giving a very high value to someone who is successful and manages to have many possessions.  These societies are highly corrupt, since the people who live in them are insecure and dependent on the approval of the social environment, and so they seek more possessions by unlawful means in order to appear even more successful.  Then, ordinary goods are not enough, they need to buy luxury goods.

Now, if we take this way of being to the national level, this will be a country that generates conflicts.  It will cost them a lot to negotiate with a view to the common benefit. They would rather obtain the best dividends for their own country.  Nationalist states are the expression of egoism at the national level.  These are states that exalt patriotism in a chauvinist way, boasting patriotic values, their heroes.  They boast of being the best.  They consider themselves first class people in comparison with those of other countries, which are second-class.  They look down on other peoples, especially indigenous peoples, and therefore they find it very difficult to accept them as equals and share their goods and natural resources with them.  Rather, they see other peoples as competition, as a threat, as rivals to be defeated even by use of force. These are very unequal societies, where very few have most of the income.  Such countries are not respectful of human rights, and so they tend to subjugate their peoples.  They respect national sovereignty as long as it is their own.  They are colonialists and tend to take advantage of other people’s natural resources.

If, on the contrary, individuals are educated, discouraging selfish and aggressive attitudes, fostering a culture of respect and tolerance, teaching how to resolve conflicts in a nonviolent way, talking through differences, then we will generate people capable of sharing, with an inclusive consciousness that welcomes the ideas of others with respect, even if they are not like our own.  Extrapolating this behaviour to the social level, we can conclude that it will be a multilateralist society that will negotiate common solutions based on a solution that is beneficial to all parties.  They will be welcoming societies which have no major problems in welcoming immigrants, they will be more egalitarian and invest a great deal in education and social security. They will settle their conflicts through diplomatic channels, and in very difficult cases they will turn to the International Court of Justice.  These countries are not thinking of appropriating anyone’s natural resources, fully respecting the sovereignty of peoples, without colonialist or imperialist ambitions.

These are the two sides of the coin, nationalism or multilateralism, conflict or negotiation, mistrust or trust, division or union, competition or joint undertaking, war or peace.

Nationalism, in particular militarist nationalism (it almost always is), by its intrinsic characteristics has brought to humanity all the wars that our lamentable history knows.  And not just wars, but also colonialism perpetrated by blood and fire; slavery in which other human beings were subjected to forced labour like animals, considering them as such, and that as such they could be bought and sold in the market.  And by virtue of this supremacy of certain races, they tried to form empires, destroying other peoples considered inferior, with a toll of millions of dead.  The Church itself has been an accomplice to this plundering, taking the word of God to those barbarian peoples who practice sacrilegious, satanic rites.

Thus, after centuries of civilized Western culture, in the twentieth century, humanity, horrified by the atrocities committed during the First World War founded the League of Nations through the Treaty of Versailles in order to lay the foundations for peace between peoples.  Yet it did not have favourable results in the light of history.  In the same spirit, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States, among many other countries, courageously signed the Briand-Kellog Pact in 1928 in which they pledged to renounce war for the settlement of international disputes in their national policy instruments.

We all know how this story unfolded. After the failure of the League of Nations, some will say that the Treaty of Versailles, highly damaging to Germany, ushered in the Second World War, although whatever the reasons, this war was a blatant violation of Versailles.

Once again humanity, after the Second World War, shaken, frightened, and heartbroken by so much barbarity, including the Jewish genocide and the nuclear massacre of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was told that this could not go on, that there would not be a Third World War, and so full of hopeful intentions, in an act of deep restraint and full of repentance, nations signed the United Nations Charter with an even more solemn and ambitious commitment to secure peace for humanity forever and ever.  This was the foundation of the United Nations, a multilateral body that seeks not only to preserve peace but also the human rights of all people, the quality of the environment, and, under its auspices, international conflict resolution bodies have been founded such as the International Court of Justice, to which all its members are (in theory) subject.

And yet wars continue, with military interventions in blatant violation of national sovereignty, for economic and geopolitical ends.  In addition, with the resurgence of nationalism, the emergence of terrorism, immigration, arms races, economic crises and corruption inherent in the neo-liberal system itself, we are on the verge of stumbling over the same rock again.  The phantom of a new world war is shaking humanity, since it may be the last because the human species will no longer exist.

It’s no longer about being right or left, liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, it’s just about trying to have good judgment.

To be multilateral means to resolve conflicts by seeking the common good, to be multilateral means to sit down with other peoples to seek ways to resolve the great present and future problems facing humanity, the extinction of species, water scarcity, climate change that will increase migration, the hunger of many peoples, the threat of wars and weapons of mass destruction, the arms race, terrorism and ethnic and religious differences. To be multilateral means to want to know the culture of other peoples, even those who have been adversaries for centuries, to engage in cultural and student exchanges. Finally, to be multilateral means to strengthen bonds of trust with all peoples, to turn them into fraternal peoples.

By strengthening ties and fostering trust in this way, multilateral peoples will realize that weapons and armies are not necessary, that knowing each other and strengthening ties removes fears and mistrust, that the people and culture of other peoples are as valuable as their own, with the same thoughts, feelings and needs.

A clear example of possible integration is that of Russia and the European Union, geographical, racial and cultural neighbours, which can work on strengthening trust, carrying out exchanges of all kinds, educational, artistic, sporting, religious, culinary, etc.  And they would realise that it is perfectly possible to include Russia in the European Union, and that if the United States threatens them with the penalties of hell, and with the dissolution of NATO, with the end of the nuclear umbrella, they would tell them that they no longer need an alliance like that, that they prefer the path of diplomacy to military threats, that they want to establish an alliance based on friendship and not on weapons, that they prefer cultural and educational exercises to military exercises, that they have had enough of war preparations, and they prefer preparations for a culture of peace.

The same integration is necessary for Islamic countries, and for China and Korea, not only in terms of trade, but in the same terms described in the previous paragraph, thus taking the steps to a multilateral world, reorganizing and strengthening its most emblematic bodies such as the United Nations, expanding and strengthening the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, to gradually, but decidedly and safely, take the steps towards a Universal Human Nation, in which the governments of all nations unite behind a common goal: to provide the conditions for human beings to develop in harmony with themselves, with their brothers and sisters around the world, and with the natural world of which they are a part.

MY ERRING WAYS
I know that you bless me God
And forgive my erring ways
I ask now for the strength
To serve you all my lining days
David Herr

MY ERRING WAYS
I know you bless me God
And forgive my erring ways
I ask now for the strength
To serve you all my living days
David Herr

What We Believe

Quakers emphasize the lived experience of Christ’s power in our lives, as Priest, Shepherd, Prophet, Savior, King, Redeemer, and in all His other offices.  We are united in this Life of Christ not by what we can recite from our heads, but what we can recount from our hearts of the presence and work there of our Lord.  Real faith is borne out in the details of our daily lives and the strength of our character. Any professions of faith that we make should be backed up with lives that witness to simplicity, humility, steadfast love and concrete work for justice.

Our Book of Discipline is a record and a reminder of the truth that we have committed ourselves to as a people gathered in Jesus Christ. We share our joys and challenges to help each other to live up to the witness of Christ that is present in our hearts. Bearing each other’s burdens, we can fulfill the law of Christ, which is love, peace and tenderness. When we come together in the presence of the Holy Spirit, it is our experience that God gathers us into the truth and empowers us to lift up a shared testimony. The following is an example of one such written testimony, the fruit of our living experience of Christ in community:

Our Answer for the Hope that Lies within Us: Principles to Keep before OYM Friends

This document is a summary of the contributions of individual Friends gathered at one worshipful session held during the 2003 session of Ohio Yearly Meeting for the purpose of articulating the common faith and beliefs of Friends in OYM. Friends who participated felt the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ move among them as they outlined their faith. However, this is not a comprehensive statement of OYM beliefs, nor is it to be taken as a creedal statement.

Jesus Christ lives and acts now within you and me. He is our hope of glory. Jesus, the living Word of God, will talk to us. He is the One who can speak to our condition. We experience Jesus Christ directly, drinking from the Living water and being refreshed as that spiritual stream flows over us. We can address God in prayer. When He speaks to us, we must listen and then obey.

Jesus’ outward work allowed us salvation from sin. His inner work transforms us. By God’s almighty power and grace we can be lifted out of sin into righteousness. God can break into our lives at any time, unexpectedly, to change what we do and even who we are.

We can pursue our own salvation by hanging our greed, lusts, anger, and other sins on the cross. By accepting the cross into our lives, we yield to and follow Christ.

Conversion, convincement, and transformation happen in different ways to different people. Some people experience an immediate, dramatic event; some people know steady spiritual growth; some people have both.

Truth does exist, and we can know it both individually and corporately. We know Truth through the immediate presence of Christ within us. The Scriptures, which were given by God, cannot contradict Truth. They contribute to our understanding of Truth, and they stand as a second authority to check our understanding of God’s Word within us.

When two or three are gathered together in Jesus’ name, He is in the midst of them. When we allow Him to work in and among us, He can bring us into corporate one-mindedness. We enter into corporate worship and business with the confident expectation that Christ, our pastor and shepherd, will direct us in both general practice and specific detail. God calls all believers into the priesthood, bestowing gifts and appointing members for the accomplishment of His will within the community. God calls us to faithfulness in using His gifts and to obedience in following His direction. An inward baptism is the only essential baptism, and spiritual communion with God is the only required communion.

We teach the importance of the commandments to trust in the Lord with all your heart, to acknowledge Him in all your ways, and to love one another. It is our desire that the words we have used here not be stumbling blocks in the communication of our faith but rather that our words reflect the Truth that we know.

Thais Carr

Reading for February 2 from Praying for Justice. “Was not my soul grieved for the poor?” Job 30: 25b


02.02.2019 – Berlin, Germany Reto Thumiger

This post is also available in: German

INF Treaty suspension: Prevent the deployment of new missiles

One day after the USA announced suspension of the INF Treaty, Russia has followed suit and announced the development of new missiles.

US withdrawal from the INF Treaty by Donald Trump breaks with a proven arms control measure, and is thus exposing the world, and Europe in particular, to an irresponsible risk, according to criticism today from ICAN’s partner organisations ICAN Germany and IPPNW in response to the statement by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Washington.

Six-month countdown begins

Notice of withdrawal from the INF Treaty will last for a six-month period.  Without a surprising turn of events in the next half year, the treaty will terminate on the 2nd of August, 2019.  The USA and Russia will then be able to develop and deploy new nuclear missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km without any hindrance – without any measures of transparency and control.

“Today’s US announcement of notice to terminate the INF treaty is the start of a new, uncontrolled arms race.  The USA and Russia will be able to build new medium-range missiles for Europe without hindrance, because the plans are already in the works,” said Xanthe Hall, board member of ICAN Germany and disarmament officer of the medical organization IPPNW.  “Europe must now avoid being drawn into a new Cold War. A clear ‘no’ from European states to the re-stationing of medium-range missiles is now necessary.  Germany must set a good example to prevent a new nuclear arms race at the expense of Europeans”.

“We see the withdrawal as a disregard for future generations,” explained Inga Blum, board member of IPPNW and ICAN Germany.  “Thousands of our parents took to the streets for fear of a nuclear war to prevent the stationing of medium-range missiles in Europe.  For them it was also about a future without fear for their children and grandchildren.  Now the fear is back for me and my children.”

Street theatre action in Berlin

Only yesterday activists from ICAN, IPPNW, DFG-VK and the campaign “Büchel is everywhere! nuclear-free now” protested in front of the Russian and USA embassies.

Actors in street theatre scenes showed what should now happen: Trump and Putin must talk to each other and finally abolish nuclear weapons.  Even the US nuclear bombs, which are currently still deployed in Germany, should be destroyed.

During the performance, activists in Trump and Putin masks sit at tables with red telephones, an actress representing Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel tries to mediate.  Subsequently, atomic bombs made of cardboard are sawn up and a huge Nuclear Weapon Prohibition Treaty is signed.  Other activists hold banners in yellow radiation protection suits.

Mainz sends a strong signal for nuclear disarmament

The day after Donald Trump’s suspension of the INF treaty, the city of Mainz sent a clear signal for nuclear disarmament.  Lord Mayor Michael Ebling was the first German Lord Mayor to sign the ICAN appeal for a nuclear weapons ban.

This makes Mainz, the state capital of Rheinland-Pfalz, the state in which US nuclear weapons are deployed, the first German city to join the international appeal which has already been signed by major cities in Australia (Sydney), Great Britain (Manchester) and the USA (Los Angeles).

Lord Mayor Ebling supports the demand of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning organizations ICAN and IPPNW to the Federal Government to sign the UN Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty. The City Appeal states: “We firmly believe that our residents have the right to live in a world free from this threat. Any use of nuclear weapons, whether deliberate or accidental, would have catastrophic, far-reaching and long-lasting consequences for people and the environment.

Martin Hinrichs, member of the board of ICAN Germany, explained at the signing of the appeal:

“Against the background of yesterday’s suspension by the USA of the INF Treaty, the city of Mainz is drawing the right conclusions, while the Federal Government continues to shirk its commitment to the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty.”

Photos by Maga Navarrete for Pressenza:

Ican4

Blog Stats

  • 11,102 hits
February 2019
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Support 2007, 2008 and 2009

More Light Presbyterians

Visite recenti

Dietrich Bonhoeffer

We must act and dare the appropiateness and not whatever comes to our mind not floating in the likelihood but grasp the reality as brave as we can be freedom lies in action not in the absence of mind obedience knows the essence of good and satisfies it, freedom dares to act and returns God the ultimate judgment of what is right and what is wrong, Obedience performs blindly but Freedom is wide awake Freedom wants to know why, Obedience has its hands tied, Freedom is inventive obedient man respects God’s commands and by virtu of his Freedom, he creats new commands. Both Obedience and Freedom come true in responsability (Dietrich Bonhoeffer)

Blog Stats

  • 11,102 hits
Follow Ecumenics and Quakers on WordPress.com