You are currently browsing the daily archive for September 1, 2017.

31.08.2017 – Stockholm, Sweden Pressenza Budapest

This post is also available in: Spanish

Global nuclear weapons: Modernization remains the priority

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) today launches its annual nuclear forces data, which highlights the current trends and developments in world nuclear arsenals. The data shows that while the overall number of nuclear weapons in the world continues to decline, all of the nuclear weapon-possessing states are in the process of modernizing their nuclear arsenals and will not be prepared to give them up for the foreseeable future.

At the start of 2017 nine states—the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea—possessed approximately 4150 operationally deployed nuclear weapons. If all nuclear warheads are counted, these states together possessed a total of approximately 14 935 nuclear weapons, compared with 15 395 in early 2016 (see table 1).

Table 1. World nuclear forces, 2017

Country Year of first
nuclear test
Total 2017
USA 1945 1,800 5,000 6,800
Russia 1949 1,950 5,050 7,000
UK 1952 120 95 215
France 1960 280 20 300
China 1964 270 270
India 1974 120–130 120–130
Pakistan 1998 130–140 130–140
Israel     . . 80 80
North Korea 2006 10-20 10-20
Total 4,150 10,785 14,935

* Deployed warheads refers to warheads placed on missiles or located on bases with operational forces.
** Other warheads refers to warheads that are held in reserve or that are retired and awaiting dismantlement.

All estimates are approximate and are as of January 2017. Total figures assume the highest estimate when a range is given and do not include figures for North Korea. Source: SIPRI Yearbook 2017.

Nuclear weapon reductions slow down, investment levels rise

The decrease in the overall number of nuclear weapons in the world is due mainly to Russia and the USA—which together still account for nearly 93 per cent of all nuclear weapons—further reducing their inventories of strategic nuclear weapons. However, despite the implementation of the bilateral Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (New START) since 2011, the pace of their reductions remains slow. At the same time, both Russia and the USA have extensive and expensive nuclear modernization programmes underway. The USA, for example, plans to spend $400 billion in 2017–26 on maintaining and comprehensively updating its nuclear forces. Some estimates suggest that the USA’s nuclear weapon modernization programme may cost up to $1 trillion over the next 30 years.

‘The projected increases in US spending are not unexpected,’ said SIPRI Associate Senior Fellow Hans Kristensen.* ‘The current US administration is continuing the ambitious nuclear modernization plans set out by President Barack Obama.’

The other nuclear weapon-possessing states have much smaller arsenals, but have all either begun to deploy new nuclear weapon delivery systems or announced their intention to do so. China has started a long-term modernization programme focused on making qualitative improvements to its nuclear arsenal. India and Pakistan are both expanding their nuclear weapon stockpiles and developing their missile delivery capabilities. North Korea is estimated to have enough fissile material for approximately 10–20 nuclear warheads, which is an increase on the estimates for previous years. North Korea carried out an unprecedented number of flight tests of different missile systems in 2016 with mixed results.

‘Despite the recent progress in international talks on a treaty banning nuclear weapons, long-term modernization programmes are under way in all nine states,’ said SIPRI Senior Researcher Shannon Kile. ‘This suggests that none of these states will be prepared to give up their nuclear arsenals for the foreseeable future.’


Blog Stats

  • 8,709 hits
September 2017
« Aug   Oct »

Support 2007, 2008 and 2009

More Light Presbyterians

Visite recenti

Dietrich Bonhoeffer

We must act and dare the appropiateness and not whatever comes to our mind not floating in the likelihood but grasp the reality as brave as we can be freedom lies in action not in the absence of mind obedience knows the essence of good and satisfies it, freedom dares to act and returns God the ultimate judgment of what is right and what is wrong, Obedience performs blindly but Freedom is wide awake Freedom wants to know why, Obedience has its hands tied, Freedom is inventive obedient man respects God’s commands and by virtu of his Freedom, he creats new commands. Both Obedience and Freedom come true in responsability (Dietrich Bonhoeffer)

Blog Stats

  • 8,709 hits
Follow Ecumenics and Quakers on