You are currently browsing the daily archive for June 6, 2017.

05.06.2017 Pressenza London

With bold ‘for the many’ platform, Corbyn rides Sanders-like wave in UK
Labour Party General Election Launch, 9th May 2017 at Event City, Trafford, Manchester – “For the Many not (Image by Sophie Brown, Wikimedia Commons)

In Wednesday night’s televised debate, Jeremy Corbyn accused his rivals of prioritizing the wealthiest over the vulnerable.

by Jake Johnson, staff writer for Common Dreams

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s prospects are rising ahead of upcoming elections in the United Kingdom, as his insurgent campaign rides a wave of progressive populism similar to the one created by Senator Bernie Sanders in the United States last year.

With the British election just a week away, the BBC on Wednesday hosted a debate featuring several party leaders, including Corbyn, who has in recent days surged rapidly in public opinion polls.

The most recent survey, conducted by YouGov/The Times, finds the Tories ahead of Labour by a mere three points. This drastic shift has appeared to inject new life into an election that was previously viewed as a potential landslide victory for the Conservatives.

On Wednesday, Corbyn used the televised debate—and the fact that Prime Minister Theresa May declined to participate—to further his party’s momentum.
“Britain deserves to see the only two people who could be the next Prime Minister debate,” Corbyn tweeted the morning of the event in a last-minute effort to persuade May to attend.
Once on the debate stage, however, Corbyn shifted his focus to the agenda of May’s party and its “record of working for the few” over the many. While Corbyn’s argument that the rival party’s program favors the wealthy is not new, it is bolstered by a fresh report showing that the Conservatives, as The Independent put it, “raised more than 10 times as much money from large donors in the most recent week of the general election campaign.”
In a particularly heated exchange with Home Secretary Amber Rudd, who quipped that the Labour leader’s economics presumed the existence of a “money tree,” Corbyn argued that the Conservatives are out of touch with the needs of the most vulnerable.
“Have you been to a foodbank?” Corbyn asked. “Have you seen people sleeping around our stations? Have you seen the levels of poverty that exist because of your government’s conscious decisions on the deficit?” As was the case throughout the night, these lines elicited significant applause.
Corbyn’s opponents attempted to explain this applause away by arguing that the audience was disproportionately “left-wing,” but Labour’s rapid climb in the polls indicates that the growing enthusiasm for Corbyn is no facade. As the Evening Standard reported on Thursday, “more voters in [London] say they think Labour’s leader would make a better Prime Minister than Mrs May.”

The Standard continued:

Asked who would make the best Prime Minister, 37 per cent picked Mr Corbyn and 34 per cent Mrs May. A survey taken just after the manifesto launched last month had Mrs May ahead by 38 to 32.

Such surveys indicate a “remarkable change in fortunes for the Tories, which had a 24-point lead over Labour when the snap general election was called in April,” The Independent further noted.

In the view of the Corbyn team, the turnaround is a direct consequence of Labour’s political agenda, which was highlighted by its recently released “For the Many, Not the Few” manifesto.
Following the debate, Labour issued a triumphant statement, arguing that “Corbyn clearly won” and that he “showed himself as a leader who wants to change the country for the better.”
“Tonight’s debate highlighted the clear choice at this election,” a Corbyn spokesperson said, “between a Labour party that will invest in and transform our society to build a Britain for the many, and a Conservative party that has held people back and stand[s] only for the few.”

Blog Stats

  • 7,745 hits
June 2017
« May   Jul »

Support 2007, 2008 and 2009

More Light Presbyterians

Visite recenti

Dietrich Bonhoeffer

We must act and dare the appropiateness and not whatever comes to our mind not floating in the likelihood but grasp the reality as brave as we can be freedom lies in action not in the absence of mind obedience knows the essence of good and satisfies it, freedom dares to act and returns God the ultimate judgment of what is right and what is wrong, Obedience performs blindly but Freedom is wide awake Freedom wants to know why, Obedience has its hands tied, Freedom is inventive obedient man respects God’s commands and by virtu of his Freedom, he creats new commands. Both Obedience and Freedom come true in responsability (Dietrich Bonhoeffer)

Blog Stats

  • 7,745 hits
Follow Ecumenics and Quakers on